Skip to main content

Is it bad to eat snow?

Kids love to taste, even a snow. I really like eating snow too, but wait a moment. This winter, I thought a little and questioned my old behaviour. What if polluted air particulates mix with snow? the particles that cause cancer, for example. As far as I am aware of, there are carcinogenic particulates in the air and their life-time is long. So, is it really good to taste snow? and if not, when is it safe to eat snow?

As snow falls from the sky, it traps and binds with air particles. The most common particles found out bound with snow are soot and other chemicals that are released by oil industries, coal and wood burning plants. Pesticides that have been in the air for a long period of time may also appear in the current snow. Researchers found out that, even 30, 40, 50 years old air particles, in several cities, are found in snow, even if the amounts are very low.

When is it safe to eat snow? It is better to wait for two or three snow falls. The first fall is not a guarantee that it removes the toxic particles in the air.  In the second fall, few of the particles can be removed and the third fall is a guarantee that, at least, most of the heavy particles are removed from the air. It is generally true that the longer the snow falls, the lesser the pollution levels in the air, and hence less in the snow. But it is better to watch out the advected snow from industries and pesticide sites to the cities or the households. If the wind is blowing from the direction of the oil wells, coal burning plants and wood burning sites, then the snow should be avoided.

Which snow is better to eat? the one on the ground or intercepted from the air. Researchers found out that the snow on the ground contains more contaminants than the snow in the air, as the snow mixes with dirt on the ground. So, it is advisable generally to avoid eating snow from the ground. I personally, recommend capturing the snow with a clean tray, which is better than  the snow ploughed from the ground.

Which snow is better, urban snow or rural? The urban snow can contain gasoline chemicals from exhaust from cars such as benzene, which is dangerous to health.  The rural snow on the other hand, can contain particles from the pesticides used for farming. Therefore, both urban and non-urban snows are vulnerable to pollutants. Next time you feel to bite snow, consider researching the area around it, for example, whether there is any industry, or pesticides nearby.

While snow is the best thing that nature has provided us, we should be careful when we put it to our mouth, or should you 'enjoy it!'? Because the amount of particles are less in the snow, but most importantly, life is short or whatever!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to cool during heatwaves

Under a warming climate intense heatwaves are expected that would stay for hours, days, weeks and months.  It becomes even worse under urbanization - the more cities grow , the  more natural land covers such as vegetation and soil are replaced by impervious surfaces such as concrete, asphalt roads and buildings. These impervious  urban surfaces can't retain water much longer like soil and vegetation and this would exacerbate the heating further.  Urban heat islands add more than 3 deg. C (Fig. 1) to the heatwaves. The combined effects of heatwaves and urban heat islands are heat-related illnesses and death - specifically affecting young toddlers and old people because their body regulation mechanism is lower. Figure 1. Urban heat island adds more than 3 deg. C to the heatwaves and increases the frequency or duration of the heat. Under a warming climate, it is only a matter of time before we start to seek for cooling mechanisms both for short term and long t...

Are we creating our own weather and climate reality?

Let us explore alternative ideas about the causes of the extremes of weather and climate. Are we creating our own weather reality? According to Quantum Mechanics, "the action of measurement changes the state of a physical system". This is derived from the superposition principle and "the Schrodinger's cat paradox", i.e., a cat put in a box with a radioactive element is both dead and alive until someone opens the box. This is to mean that the state of the cat is the superposition of the two states "death" and "life". Whether the superposition is linear or non-linear doesn't matter here. The presence of a radioactive material may favor more of death state than alive, so that the superposition sways towards the other end. Then the question is, what is the action of opening? The action of opening collapses the state into one, either death or life and not the superposition of the two. Does the action of opeing the box result in the happenned ...

Urbanisation: The problem of local climate modification

People migrate to cities due to different reasons such as easy access to schools, health facilities, jobs and transportation . More people, therefore, live in urban areas than in rural. According to the  United Nations estimate, in 2014 more than 54% of the world population dwell in cities. It was 30% in 1950. Projections indicate that 66%  of the world's population will live in urban by 2050 . Most of urban people reside in relatively small areas with high number of inhabitants per square meter of land (UN, 2015): " Close to half of the world's urban dwellers reside in relatively small settlements of less than 500, 000 inhabitants, while only around one in eight live in the 28 mega-cities with more than 10 million inhabitants. " It is ages since people noticed that urban air was different from rural air. However, it was air pollution which is the hallmark of the urban atmosphere. In 1818 Luke Howard (1772-1864) published the first edition of a book deal...