Skip to main content

Is it bad to eat snow?

Kids love to taste, even a snow. I really like eating snow too, but wait a moment. This winter, I thought a little and questioned my old behaviour. What if polluted air particulates mix with snow? the particles that cause cancer, for example. As far as I am aware of, there are carcinogenic particulates in the air and their life-time is long. So, is it really good to taste snow? and if not, when is it safe to eat snow?

As snow falls from the sky, it traps and binds with air particles. The most common particles found out bound with snow are soot and other chemicals that are released by oil industries, coal and wood burning plants. Pesticides that have been in the air for a long period of time may also appear in the current snow. Researchers found out that, even 30, 40, 50 years old air particles, in several cities, are found in snow, even if the amounts are very low.

When is it safe to eat snow? It is better to wait for two or three snow falls. The first fall is not a guarantee that it removes the toxic particles in the air.  In the second fall, few of the particles can be removed and the third fall is a guarantee that, at least, most of the heavy particles are removed from the air. It is generally true that the longer the snow falls, the lesser the pollution levels in the air, and hence less in the snow. But it is better to watch out the advected snow from industries and pesticide sites to the cities or the households. If the wind is blowing from the direction of the oil wells, coal burning plants and wood burning sites, then the snow should be avoided.

Which snow is better to eat? the one on the ground or intercepted from the air. Researchers found out that the snow on the ground contains more contaminants than the snow in the air, as the snow mixes with dirt on the ground. So, it is advisable generally to avoid eating snow from the ground. I personally, recommend capturing the snow with a clean tray, which is better than  the snow ploughed from the ground.

Which snow is better, urban snow or rural? The urban snow can contain gasoline chemicals from exhaust from cars such as benzene, which is dangerous to health.  The rural snow on the other hand, can contain particles from the pesticides used for farming. Therefore, both urban and non-urban snows are vulnerable to pollutants. Next time you feel to bite snow, consider researching the area around it, for example, whether there is any industry, or pesticides nearby.

While snow is the best thing that nature has provided us, we should be careful when we put it to our mouth, or should you 'enjoy it!'? Because the amount of particles are less in the snow, but most importantly, life is short or whatever!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Building Resilience in the Face of Climate Change: The Limitations of Adaptation

Climate change is an undeniable reality, and its impacts are already being felt across the globe. However, many parts of the world, particularly developing regions like sub-Saharan Africa, are ill-prepared to adapt to these changes. This lack of preparedness stems from several interconnected factors: Limited access to climate predictions: Many regions in sub-Saharan Africa lack access to reliable and accurate climate predictions, making it difficult for communities to anticipate and plan for future climate-related events. Inadequate adaptation technologies: Even when climate predictions are available, communities may not have access to the necessary technologies and resources to implement effective adaptation measures. This can be particularly challenging in regions with limited infrastructure and economic resources. Dependency on external aid: Many developing countries rely heavily on international aid to support climate adaptation efforts. However, this can create a dependency on...

Urban surface parameterizations, uncertainties and challenges

My recent review paper "Review of urban surface parameterizations for numerical climate models"( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212095517300858 ) presents the historical development of urban climate models, uncertainties and challenges  in obtaining representative urban weather and climate information. There are wide scale urban weather/climate models and the level of detail and complexity required for a particular study is oftentimes a challenge for the climate modeling communities. Weather/climate models are required for different purposes, such as understanding the teleconnections between different scale weather/climate phenomena, for weather forecasting and climate projections, and for policy purposes. Therefore, improving the performance of climate models is one of the top priorities in the climate modeling communities. On the other hand, obtaining accurate initial and boundary information is challenging. Observations data of high spatial density ...

Notes on spectral nudging urban climate models - Nudging is wrong, do not do it

Debate erupted about spectrally nudging regional climate models during summer 2016 training on regional climate modeling at National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). The debate was whether nudging is valid for regional climate models. Because of the interest of many participants who were PhDs and postdocs from all over the world, special session was assigned for extended discussion. I was new to the nudging concepts at the time, but thought that it is interesting, especially whether nudging is useful for downscaling reanalysis and GCMs incorporating urban canopy models. I dropped my ear and followed the discussion. Based on the ideas raised from the organizers and participants, I also forwarded some questions of relevance for the urban climate modeling. As an extended discussion during the afternoon, many questions were raised: If a regional climate model is spectrally nudged, doesn't it lose its added value as a regional climate model because nudging forces the model t...